Consider a network of routers with multicast routing turned on. Somewhere in the network there are a pair of adjacent routers with two equal cost paths between them. You display the config on the routers and see the following -
On Router1
interface Tunnel0
ip address 6.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
tunnel source Ethernet0/0
tunnel destination 5.1.1.1
!
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 2.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/2
ip address 3.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
On Router2
interface Tunnel0
ip address 5.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
tunnel source Ethernet1/4
tunnel destination 6.1.1.1
!
interface Ethernet1/1
ip address 2.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet1/2
ip address 3.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
!
That is, there is a GRE tunnel between the two routers and multicast is being run over the tunnel rather than directly on the physical interfaces between the two routers.
Why would such a thing be done between directly connected routers both of whom are multicast capable? Is that tunnel superfluous or is it actually being useful in some manner?
- Cisco Certified Architect
- Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert - CCIE
- Cisco Certified Design Expert - CCDE
- Cisco Certified Wireless Professional - CCNP Wirel...
- Cisco Certified Voice Professional - CCVP
- Cisco Certified Security Professional - CCSP
- Cisco Certified Internetwork Professional - CCIP
- Cisco Certified Design Professional - CCDP
- Cisco Certified Network Professional - CCNP
- Cisco Certified Network Associate - CCNA
0 comments:
Post a Comment